Archive

Posts Tagged ‘foresight style’

Opening of the Centre of Foresight Studies (CEP) in Mexico

March 19, 2010 Comments off

On the 19th of March 2010, the Institute of Management and Public Administration of the State of Mexico (IAPEM) opened a new Centre for Foresight Studies (CEP). The ceremony began with welcoming remarks from the President of IAPEN, Isidro Muñoz Rivera, who introduced some of the rationales and specific objectives of the Centre of Foresight Studies (CEP), for example: to undertake foresight studies in a context characterised by constant paradigm transformation; to visualise scenarios for better management and public administration practices; and to achieve desirable and possible futures through effective governance and participative policy-making.

This was followed by a few words from the Head of the National Advisory Board of the Centre, Yuri Serbolov Palos, who briefly introduced the Mexican activities and major players in foresight. Subsequently, the Director of CEP, Christian Alvarado, introduced the two international speakers: Rafael Popper (keynote on Global Foresight Practices and Trends) and Javier Medina (keynote on Foresight in Latin America).

After the keynotes, a commemorative plaque was unveiled. The English translation reads:

IAPEM
A space of reflection for good governance

On the Nineteenth of March of 2010 was the inauguration of the
CENTRE FOR FORESIGHT STUDIES
With the presence of the distinguished foresighters:
Rafael Popper
University of Manchester, England
Javier Medina
Universidad del Valle, Colombia

Toluca
, State of Mexico

 

Opening of the Foresight Studies Centre (CEP, Toluca, Mexico)

Opening of the Foresight Studies Centre (CEP, State of Mexico, Mexico)

Emerald Literati Awards for Excellence: Highly Commended Award Winner

March 2, 2009 Leave a comment
Highly Commended Paper Award

2009 Awards for Excellence

Letter from Emerald Literati Network
==========================

Dear Rafael Popper,

Emerald Literati Network
2009 Awards for Excellence

Every year Emerald invites each journal’s Editorial Team to nominate what they believe has been that title’s Outstanding Paper and up to three Highly Commended Papers from the previous 12 months. Your paper has been included among these and I am pleased to inform you that your article entitled Comparing foresight style in six world regions published in foresight has been chosen as an Highly Commended Award Winner at the Literati Network Awards for Excellence 2009.

The award winning papers are chosen following consultation amongst the journal’s Editorial Team, many of whom are eminent academics or managers. Your paper has been selected as it was one of the most impressive pieces of work the team has seen throughout 2008.

The Awards for Excellence 2009 can be found at the following site:
http://info.emeraldinsight.com/authors/literati/awards.htm?PHPSESSID=jjg6t8jcj769sl7vnfro1426v2&year=2009&journal=fs

Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have and once again, thank you for writing for an Emerald journal and congratulations on your success!

Kind Regards,

Emma Stevenson
External Relations Assistant
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
United Kingdom

Comparing foresight ‘‘style’’ in six world regions

November 11, 2008 Comments off
Highly Commended Paper Award

2009 Awards for Excellence

Authors  – Michael Keenan and Rafael Popper

Purpose – The paper sets out to explore the nature and degree of variation in foresight ‘‘style’’ across six world regions. The underlying hypothesis is that differences in regional context – in terms of political, socio-economic, and cultural conditions – will affect foresight ‘‘style’’. At the same time, a secondary hypothesis acknowledges that policy tool transfer and international learning might soften the influence of contextual conditions.

Design/methodology/approach – Using the data collected for more than 800 foresight exercises in six world regions, the paper considers eight different dimensions of foresight ‘‘style’’, including domain coverage, time horizon, target groups, and methods used. It interprets regional differences (and similarities) with reference to dominant political and economic traditions in each region. In so doing, it tests the hypothesis that foresight ‘‘style’’ is influenced by regional context.

 
Keenan & Popper - Comparing Foresight Styles

Keenan & Popper - Comparing Foresight Styles

Findings – The analysis suggests that some foresight ‘‘style’’ dimensions vary between regions more than others. For example, there is marked variation in the domain areas covered by foresight across the world, while some regions appear to prefer particular methods over others. Time horizons also vary. For other dimensions, such as participation levels and the identity of target groups, there is a good deal of similarity. Thus, some dimensions of ‘‘style’’, at least at the aggregate level, seem to be more influenced by regional context than others.

Originality/value – The paper is unique in being the first publication to survey such a large sample of foresight activity across a wide part of the globe.

Keywords – Politics, Political science, Delphi method, Democracy, Governance, International organizations

Type – Research paper

If you wish to receive an electronic copy of this paper, please contact me at rafael.popper@manchester.ac.uk or rafael_popper@yahoo.com