Duration: From 9.30am until 3pm (including lunch and coffee break).
Location: Technology Centre ASCR (Ve Struhách 1076/27, 160 00 Prague 6).
Organiser: Futures Diamond with contributions from The University of Manchester.
The main purpose of the dialogue is to:
- Facilitate dialogue with policy-makers and other relevant stakeholders (business, NGOs, interest groups and researchers) about ways to strengthen societal engagement in sustainable innovation;
- Explore strengths and weaknesses of current policies and praxis for societal engagement in sustainable innovation;
- Discuss barriers to stimulate societal engagement in sustainable innovation;
- Develop recommendations for policy-makers to be handed over to national political committees and public authorities and to be highlighted at the CASI policy conference in November 2016.
Regarding the focus of the dialogue, we have looked at how the Top 10 research and innovation agendas resulting from the mapped 500+ SI cases (we have in CASIPEDIA and available at http://www.casi2020.eu/casipedia/cases/) are relevant to:
- 22 priorities related to Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge on ‘Climate action, resource efficiency, environment and raw materials’, and
- 27 priorities resulting from a citizens-experts-citizens (CEC) process.
We would also be discussing gaps and potential bridges between these sets of priorities, as well as their relevance to the Top 10 research-priorities voted by the Czech citizens (and inspired by their visions http://www.casi2020.eu/visions-bank/).
The foresight team of the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR) has successfully delivered a 3-day foresight course for the National Research Council (CNR) in Italy.
The course programme consisted of 16 sessions, including eight lectures, five practical exercises and three interactive discussions:
The eight lectures focused on:
- Foresight Fundamentals and Methods: A comprehensive review of Foresight Methods, tools and techniques (Delivered by R. Popper)
- Foresight Fundamentals and Methods: Analysis of the pros and cons of each of the tools and methodologies (Delivered by R. Popper)
- A detailed examination of top-down vs. bottom-up foresight approaches (Delivered by R. Popper & G. Velasco)
- Using Interaction: Multi-Stakeholder and WI-WE Workshops – Selected case studies: VERA and iKnow projects (Delivered by R. Popper)
- Using Expertise: Expert Panels and Interviews (Delivered by R. Popper & G. Velasco)
- Roadmapping Fundamentals and Applications (Delivered by R. Popper & G. Velasco)
- Using the results of Foresight: From Anticipating to Recommending Futures (Delivered by R. Popper & G. Velasco)
- Sustaining impact: On foresight and horizon scanning platforms (Delivered by R. Popper)
The five practical exercises focused on:
- Process and Methodology
- Design and management of participatory processes
- Design and management of expert-based processes
- Recommendations and Impact
The three interactive discussions focused on:
- Mixing technocratic and democratic approaches: How could additional tools or techniques add value to the current S&T Foresight Project approach?
- Strengths and weaknesses of various Foresight approaches with particular reference to the Science and Technology Project approach
- CNR Foresight vis-à-vis global foresight approaches: How can the S&T Foresight team improve the presentation of the results of the Foresight project? How can stakeholder engagement be improved?
For further information about the CNR Foresight Project, please contact Luisa Tondelli at email@example.com
To see the full course programme, please click here
The ERA Open Advice report and related Policy Brief come at a time when we seek a renewed momentum to support Europe’s way out of the crisis and tackle grand challenges through an improved European Research Area (ERA). They offer a great opportunity to step back and raise a critical wake-up call on the very purpose, shape and ambition of ERA. Here we have captured the essence of ERA stakeholders’ views on rethinking ERA priorities and broadening the agenda.
Three key messages and a considerable number of policy issues have emerged: First, the existing ERA priorities are of great importance and should be further pursued. Second, however, there is a concern that the definition of those priorities is too narrow and not flexible enough and thus must be re-visited. Third, and even more important, the debate has led to the identification of new ERA dimensions that have not been captured in the ERA discourse so far, but which deserve more policy attention and integration into the evolving dimensions of the European R&I landscape.
To download the report and policy brief please click on the images below or visit the VERA project website at: http://www.eravisions.eu/documents/deliverables
VERA Symposium on Strategies for European Research & Innovation Futures (Manchester, 23-24 October 2014)
The VERA project – Forward Visions on the European Research Area – is organising a Symposium on Strategies for European Research & Innovation Futures in Manchester that will serve as a conclusion meeting to a participatory foresight process initiated earlier this year, whereby seven stakeholders’ groups (a selected representation of Society, Academy, Industry, Research funders, ERA instruments experts, Policy-makers and International RTDI actors) discussed on the future of the ERA by 2030 drawing on four exploratory scenarios. We are very pleased to invite you to take part in this event, to be held at The Lowry on October 23-24 (click here to download Symposium Agenda).
This slideshow highlights key moments of the strategic debate focus group (FG) on strategies and recommendations for the future of European Research Area (ERA) with selected actors involved in ERA-related instruments (ERA-NETs, ERA Chairs, JPIs, etc.). The FG was part of VERA Work Package 5 activities led by the Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR) in the framework of the European Commission funded VERA project.
The focus group (FG) was co-organised with IPTS in Spain in order to explore:
- Key opportunities and threats of ERA futures for ERA-related actors.
- Key strategies of ERA-related actors vis-à-vis ERA scenarios by 2030.
- Key objectives of ERA-related actors that should be included in the ERA agenda.
- Key strategies of ERA-related actors vis-à-vis ERA objectives.
- Key recommendations fromERA-related actors for ERA-relevant actions today.
This discussion on the possible futures of the European Research Areas and the perspectives and interests of different stakeholders is a crucial input into the debate and policy making process at the European and national level. ERA is a dynamic concept, and it must be thought of as a long term endeavour, considering the implications for and strategies of all stakeholders involved.
In the framework of the analytical work of the KORANET project, the Austrian Centre for Social Innovation (ZSI) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) organised jointly a workshop on co-operation policy foresight in Vienna on 7 and 8 June 2010.
During the first day of the event, European and Korean experts provided insights into existing cooperation patterns between Korea and the EU and analytical results of KORANET have been presented to a wider audience of stakeholders.
On the second day, working sessions have been organised to help identify the drivers that shape the future S&T co-operation between the EU and Korea.
The Czech Technology Centre of the Academy of Sciences and the University of Manchester successfully completed Day Two of the iKNOW workshop in Prague. This involved: (1) Looking at the relationship between Wild Cards and Weak Signals and what issues this creates and (2) Discussing early actions and potential early reactions for the policy, research and business sectors.
At the end of the working sessions, we presented the past, ongoing and future activities of the iKNOW project. For further information, please visit the project website at: www.iknowfutures.eu